<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: bbPress vs. Vanilla?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingmeme.org/2006/02/06/bbpress-vs-vanilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2006/02/06/bbpress-vs-vanilla/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2006/02/06/bbpress-vs-vanilla/comment-page-1/#comment-181971</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 08:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lm.quxx.info/?p=3237#comment-181971</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i&#039;m also still trying to decide (yeah a year on and someone still thinking along the same lines). i&#039;d like to see bbPress easier to design for (like a codex for WP), otherwise bbPress seems much younger than Vanilla (already v1 as i write this). But i guess it all boils down to: &quot;Why would you want unified usertables? Unless you expect other users to post on your blog too&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m also still trying to decide (yeah a year on and someone still thinking along the same lines). i&#8217;d like to see bbPress easier to design for (like a codex for WP), otherwise bbPress seems much younger than Vanilla (already v1 as i write this). But i guess it all boils down to: &#8220;Why would you want unified usertables? Unless you expect other users to post on your blog too&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

