<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there any living, breathing example of a taxonomic approach working?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingmeme.org/2007/01/30/is-there-any-living-breathing-example-of-a-taxonomic-approach-working/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2007/01/30/is-there-any-living-breathing-example-of-a-taxonomic-approach-working/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kellan</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2007/01/30/is-there-any-living-breathing-example-of-a-taxonomic-approach-working/comment-page-1/#comment-4717</link>
		<dc:creator>kellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/2007/01/30/is-there-any-living-breathing-example-of-a-taxonomic-approach-working/#comment-4717</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jesse those both seem to be good examples of old style taxonomies: maintained by experts, slowly accreting, contended over as a limited resource.  Having to send your photos or blog posts away to the Library of Congress to find out how they should be tagged sounds like a failure case :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Alternately I suppose that you could argue that production of science and naming rather then being seen as an unwieldly domain of experts is actually an example of a self organizing community of passionate actors producing content in a distributed ad-hoc manner, sync&#039;ed only by a handful of rules.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Neither one lend themselves to casual participation. (is that a feature or a bug I wonder?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse those both seem to be good examples of old style taxonomies: maintained by experts, slowly accreting, contended over as a limited resource.  Having to send your photos or blog posts away to the Library of Congress to find out how they should be tagged sounds like a failure case <img src='http://laughingmeme.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>Alternately I suppose that you could argue that production of science and naming rather then being seen as an unwieldly domain of experts is actually an example of a self organizing community of passionate actors producing content in a distributed ad-hoc manner, sync&#8217;ed only by a handful of rules.</p>

<p>Neither one lend themselves to casual participation. (is that a feature or a bug I wonder?)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2007/01/30/is-there-any-living-breathing-example-of-a-taxonomic-approach-working/comment-page-1/#comment-3710</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/2007/01/30/is-there-any-living-breathing-example-of-a-taxonomic-approach-working/#comment-3710</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dewey Decimal?
The taxonomy of living things (Phylum, Class, Order ...)?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dewey Decimal?
The taxonomy of living things (Phylum, Class, Order &#8230;)?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
