<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOO: Crowdvine, iCalico, Pathable, a Study in Collusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingmeme.org/2007/07/11/foo-crowdvine-icalico-pathable-a-study-in-collusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2007/07/11/foo-crowdvine-icalico-pathable-a-study-in-collusion/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kellan</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2007/07/11/foo-crowdvine-icalico-pathable-a-study-in-collusion/comment-page-1/#comment-73817</link>
		<dc:creator>kellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 03:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/2007/07/11/foo-crowdvine-icalico-pathable-a-study-in-collusion/#comment-73817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good questions, but I think the lack largely comes down to a lack of imagination.   &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Assuming you&#039;ve built your app for the express intent of world domination via hordes of ensaled users, aka community members whom you&#039;ve formed lifelong meaningful bonds, and our now the center of their universe, it can be hard to envision how light weight integration works.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But its a broken model to be trying to build out more monolithic apps, the failure rate is high, the return is largely low, and the world doesn&#039;t need more of them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So we aren&#039;t seeing this integration becasue people are building the wrong kinds of apps, and even when they aren&#039;t building the wrong types of apps, their imagination is all wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions, but I think the lack largely comes down to a lack of imagination.   </p>

<p>Assuming you&#8217;ve built your app for the express intent of world domination via hordes of ensaled users, aka community members whom you&#8217;ve formed lifelong meaningful bonds, and our now the center of their universe, it can be hard to envision how light weight integration works.</p>

<p>But its a broken model to be trying to build out more monolithic apps, the failure rate is high, the return is largely low, and the world doesn&#8217;t need more of them.</p>

<p>So we aren&#8217;t seeing this integration becasue people are building the wrong kinds of apps, and even when they aren&#8217;t building the wrong types of apps, their imagination is all wrong.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene Eric Kim</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2007/07/11/foo-crowdvine-icalico-pathable-a-study-in-collusion/comment-page-1/#comment-72795</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene Eric Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 17:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/2007/07/11/foo-crowdvine-icalico-pathable-a-study-in-collusion/#comment-72795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why don&#039;t you think this kind of integration is more common?  What exactly do you mean by &quot;disposable apps&quot;?  And (guessing what I think you mean by &quot;disposable apps&quot;), do you think that this kind of integration has potential for non-disposable apps, given the social, political, and business barriers?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you think this kind of integration is more common?  What exactly do you mean by &#8220;disposable apps&#8221;?  And (guessing what I think you mean by &#8220;disposable apps&#8221;), do you think that this kind of integration has potential for non-disposable apps, given the social, political, and business barriers?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

