<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:48:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting Reading&#8230; &#8211; The Blogs at HowStuffWorks</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-807465</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting Reading&#8230; &#8211; The Blogs at HowStuffWorks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-807465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You &#8211; &#8220;Along with a whole slew of smart folks, I’ve been playing the current think game de jour, “How would you re-architect Twitter?”. Unlike most I’ve been having this conversation off and on for a couple of years, mostly with Blaine, in my unofficial “Friend of Twitter” capacity. (the same capacity that I wrote the first Twitter bot in, and have on rare occasion logged into their boxes to play “spot the run away performance issue.”)&#8221; [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You &#8211; &#8220;Along with a whole slew of smart folks, I’ve been playing the current think game de jour, “How would you re-architect Twitter?”. Unlike most I’ve been having this conversation off and on for a couple of years, mostly with Blaine, in my unofficial “Friend of Twitter” capacity. (the same capacity that I wrote the first Twitter bot in, and have on rare occasion logged into their boxes to play “spot the run away performance issue.”)&#8221; [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Couple of Caveats on Queuing - Laughing Meme</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-417492</link>
		<dc:creator>A Couple of Caveats on Queuing - Laughing Meme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-417492</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] See also: Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See also: Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: netcaetera.ro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-367499</link>
		<dc:creator>netcaetera.ro &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-367499</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You. Kellan is not an armchair architect. He also doesnâ€™t mention Rails once. Well worth reading. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You. Kellan is not an armchair architect. He also doesnâ€™t mention Rails once. Well worth reading. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: please don&#8217;t scobilize Twitter &#171; GNUosphere</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-366432</link>
		<dc:creator>please don&#8217;t scobilize Twitter &#171; GNUosphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 05:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-366432</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] radar - surely there are many, many thousands. That is, unless the geeks who really get this stuff fundamentally fix this mess, please don&#8217;t scobilize Twitter. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] radar &#8211; surely there are many, many thousands. That is, unless the geeks who really get this stuff fundamentally fix this mess, please don&#8217;t scobilize Twitter. [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-05-29 &#171; A little Jack with that?</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-364532</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-05-29 &#171; A little Jack with that?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-364532</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You - Laughing Meme Kevin: A thoughtful look at scaling issues in general and specifically some of the issues at Twitter. Scaling isn&#8217;t sexy, but it&#8217;s necessary to consider. Shiny will only get you so far. (tags: downtime growth scaling traffic) [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter, or Architecture Will Not Save You &#8211; Laughing Meme Kevin: A thoughtful look at scaling issues in general and specifically some of the issues at Twitter. Scaling isn&#8217;t sexy, but it&#8217;s necessary to consider. Shiny will only get you so far. (tags: downtime growth scaling traffic) [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellan</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-364417</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-364417</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Michael, I&#039;ve fixed.  And thanks Tim, the house is starting to disappear into boxes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael, I&#8217;ve fixed.  And thanks Tim, the house is starting to disappear into boxes.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-363819</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 03:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-363819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a fun and thought provoking read. Sent it off to a few friends. Good luck in the Big Apple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for a fun and thought provoking read. Sent it off to a few friends. Good luck in the Big Apple.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Hartl</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2008/05/28/twitter-or-architecture-will-not-save-you/comment-page-1/#comment-363705</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Hartl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 00:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=3841#comment-363705</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent article.  N.B. The last link (to Leonard&#039;s architecture) is broken.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  N.B. The last link (to Leonard&#8217;s architecture) is broken.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

