<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Laughing Meme &#187; groups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laughingmeme.org/tag/groups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laughingmeme.org</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 21:54:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flickr Blog:  Fence Friday</title>
		<link>http://laughingmeme.org/2010/01/29/flickr-blog-fence-friday/</link>
		<comments>http://laughingmeme.org/2010/01/29/flickr-blog-fence-friday/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kellan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[easy group forming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laughingmeme.org/?p=4447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has #followfriday. If I were ever to rebuild Flickr from the ground up, I&#8217;d collapse the distinction between tags and groups for thematic collaboration. Explicit grouping is useful only when you need to create a sense of place, a trick most easily accomplished in virtual environment by articulating a membership, and a history. Collaboration [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter has <a href="http://twitter.com/#search?q=followfriday">#followfriday</a>. If I were ever to rebuild Flickr from the ground up, I&#8217;d collapse the distinction between tags and groups for thematic collaboration.  Explicit grouping is useful only when you need to create a sense of place, a trick most easily accomplished in virtual environment by articulating a membership, and a history.  Collaboration does not need place, it needs energy.</p>
<p><a href='http://blog.flickr.net/en/2010/01/29/fence-friday-2/'>http://blog.flickr.net/en/2010/01/29/fence-friday-2/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://laughingmeme.org/2010/01/29/flickr-blog-fence-friday/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

